⚕️ Target audience: This clinical review is intended for physicians and healthcare professionals; It is a summary of current literature and guidelines for educational purposes. Clinical decisions should be made based on patient-specific evaluation and applicable institutional protocols.

Definition, epidemiology and clinical significance

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which includes deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is a well-defined complication of pregnancy and the postpartum period. The risk of VTE in pregnant and postpartum women is approximately four to five times increased compared to their non-pregnant counterparts; Approximately 80% of events are of venous origin, with a prevalence of 0.5–2.0 per 1,000 pregnancies (ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 196, 2018). According to American Society of Hematology (ASH) data, VTE complicates approximately 1.2 of every 1,000 births; Although the absolute risk is low, pregnancy-related VTE is one of the main preventable causes of maternal mortality and morbidity in developed countries (ASH 2018).

The temporal distribution of risk is clinically critical: the daily risk of VTE is highest during the puerperal period, especially in the first 3–6 weeks postpartum; Therefore, the postpartum period is also weighed in prophylaxis decisions (RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 37a, 2015). For anatomical reasons (the gravid uterus compresses the left iliac vein at the point where it crosses the right iliac artery), the majority of DVTs during pregnancy are located in the left leg and iliofemoral region; this is a different distribution than the non-pregnant population (UpToDate, “Venous thromboembolism in pregnancy and postpartum: Prevention”).

Pathophysiology: Hypercoagulability of pregnancy

Pregnancy is an acquired prothrombotic state that physiologically activates all three components of the Virchow triad:

  • Hypercoagulability: Increase in fibrinogen (factor I), factors VII, VIII, X and von Willebrand factor; A significant decrease in the level of free protein S and acquired activated protein C (APC) resistance develops. Fibrinolytic activity is suppressed due to plasminogen activator inhibitor-2 (PAI-2) secreted by the placenta and increased PAI-1.
  • Venous stasis: Progesterone's decrease in venous tone and the pressure of the gravid uterus on the inferior vena cava and pelvic veins slow down the venous return of the lower extremities.
  • Endothelial damage: Damage to the pelvic vascular endothelium occurs during labor and especially during cesarean section.

The risk increases even more when hereditary or acquired thrombophilia is added to this physiological basis. Thrombophilia occurs in approximately 10% of the white population but is partially responsible for approximately half of VTE events in pregnancy (UpToDate, “Inherited thrombophilias in pregnancy”). Factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A variants account for 50–60% of inherited thrombophilia in the white population.

Risk assessment and risk scoring

All pregnant women should be evaluated for the risk of VTE and bleeding before pregnancy or in the early stages of pregnancy, if possible; It should be reconsidered in the development of complications such as preeclampsia, changes in status such as transition from pregnancy to puerperium or from outpatient to inpatient monitoring (UpToDate; RCOG GTG 37a 2015). Major risk factors evaluated include previous history of VTE and nature of the triggering event (provoked/unprovoked, estrogen-related), family history, known hereditary thrombophilia, antiphospholipid syndrome, comorbid medical conditions (systemic lupus, inflammatory bowel disease, sickle cell anemia, heart disease), obesity, smoking, varicose veins, and prolonged immobilization.

Department of Health 2026 and RCOG September 2026: separate models

The national resource for Türkiye is the VTE section in the Ministry of Health Risky Pregnancies Management Guide 2026 (Publication Number 1414). Read together Table 1 scores, Table 2 general thresholds, and Table 3 specific management of previous VTE/thrombophilia. (Ministry of Health, 2026) The RCOG model includes the September 2026 Position Statement changes along with the 2023 corrected copy of the 2015 guide; This interim update is used just as the new guide is being prepared. ( RCOG, September 2026 ) ( RCOG, 2015/2023 ) Scores and times of the two models are not combined.

ACOG and UpToDate use a history-based categorical approach; UpToDate notes that it does not typically use specific pregnancy VTE score tools. Therefore, the Ministry of Health/RCOG total score is not a VTE percentage or UpToDate-verified risk estimate. In the VTE assessment tool on the site, the Ministry and the RCOG are selected separately. (in the VTE assessment tool)

Table 1. General score thresholds — special populations and safety conditions are evaluated separately
Period / conditionMinistry of Health 2026RCOG 37a + September 2026
Antenatal ≥4 pointsThromboprophylaxis is recommended starting from the first trimester.LMWH is considered starting from the first trimester; In temporary risk, the duration of the risk is also a determining factor.
Antenatal 3 pointsRecommended from the 28th week.Consider from the 28th week; do not wait in the presence of independent indications such as hospitalization/HG.
Postpartum 2–3 pointsAt least 10 days.At least 10 days; higher risk/antenatal need or longer plan in special group.
Postpartum ≥4 pointsAt least 6 weeks.The general Annex I threshold is at least 10 days; High risk, antenatal LMWH requirement, permanent risk and special rules prolong the duration. The Ministry's ≥4→6 week rule is not automatically transferred.
Baseline BMI ≥50BMI line is 2 points; There is no separate 4 point rule.LMWH is recommended throughout pregnancy and for 6 weeks postpartum.
AdmissionAntenatal hospitalization; Hospitalization or readmission in the puerperium for ≥3 days requires prophylaxis separate from the score.Antenatal hospitalization and puerperal repeat/extended hospitalization are evaluated separately from the score.

Sources: Ministry Table 2 and postpartum section; RCOG 2015 Part 4.1/7.5, Annex I and September 2026 Annex I. ( Ministry of Health, 2026 ) ( RCOG, September 2026 ) ( RCOG, 2015/2023 ) A low score does not exclude VTE. Postpartum risk is reassessed; Just because LMWH has been used for a short time for a temporary antenatal risk does not automatically mean 6 weeks without other information.

Table 1a. Scoring items and differences across sources (Ministry of Health, 2026) (RCOG, September 2026) (RCOG, 2015/2023)
Risk factorMinistry 2026RCOG + September 2026Scope / exception
Previous VTE other than a single major surgery-related event44Expert management; At least 6 weeks postpartum in previous VTE.
Previous VTE triggered by a single, major surgery33Single event and absence of additional risk are evaluated separately; The overall score alone does not give a plan.
Antithrombin, proteinC/S deficiency; homozygous or multiple thrombophilias33Antithrombin, protein C/S deficiency, homozygous/combined defect; expert way.
Identified significant comorbid disease33Cancer, heart failure, active SLE/IBD/polyarthropathy, nephrotic syndrome, Type 1 DM with nephropathy, sickle cell disease, current IV drug dependence. The group is counted once.
Unprovoked or estrogen-related VTE in a first-degree relative11Not expanded to a history of any clot in any relative.
Heterozygous FVL or heterozygous prothrombin G20210A in the absence of a VTE history11Heterozygous FVL or prothrombin G20210A; protein C/S does not enter this line.
Age>351135 years: 0; 36 years and older: 1.
Pregnancy onset BMI30–39,9: 1; ≥40: 230–39,9: 1; 40–49,9: 2; ≥50: 4BMI at the start of pregnancy; do not add the bands together. For BMI ≥50, RCOG also recommends prophylaxis throughout pregnancy + 6 weeks postpartum.
Parity≥311Once the third delivery has occurred, parity (para) becomes 3.
Cigarette11Ministry: >10 units/day; RCOG: active smoking.
Large/prominent varicose vein11Definitions are given separately in the description below.
Preeclampsia in this pregnancy11In the context of the current pregnancy/birth.
ART/IVF11Antenatal only; It is not carried over to the postpartum score.
Multiple pregnancy11Current pregnancy.
Caesarean section in labor22Count only an actual cesarean delivery during labor; do not also count elective CS.
Elective caesarean section11If there is additional risk, the total and specific CS recommendation is evaluated separately.
Mid/rotational invasive birth11Ministry: medium/rotational forceps. It is not generalized to every operative vaginal birth.
Labor >24 hours11A full 24 hours is not enough; >24 hours.
Bleeding >1 liter or transfusion11Bleeding and transfusion as one score on the same line; active bleeding is a safety barrier.
Birth in this pregnancy<37+0 weeks11Actual birth <37+0; Being less than 37 weeks pregnant does not give this score.
Stillbirth in this pregnancy11The result of birth during this pregnancy.
Other surgery during pregnancy/puerperium34E.g. appendectomy, postpartum sterilization. The same CS a second time does not count as additional surgery.
Hyperemesis gravidarum33Antenatal. RCOG: offering LMWH within 72 hours in defined severe HG; hospitalization/immobility period also.
Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome44First trimester; The temporary risk period marked RCOG applies.
Current systemic infection14RCOG: Systemic infection requiring IV antibiotics or hospitalization.
Immobilization or dehydration14Immobilization ≥3 days / dehydration; the same row is not counted twice.
Long trip>4hours1No separate rows in new scoreboardPoints in the Ministry; Within the scope of RCOG 2015 general risk, there is no separate line in the September 2026 renewed Annex I score.

Definition of varicose veins: The Ministry footnote defines varicose veins that are prominent above the kneecap, exceed 1 cm in diameter, and cause skin discoloration, including pelvic varicose veins. RCOG defines prominent varicose veins that are symptomatic, above the knee, or associated with phlebitis, edema, or skin changes. (Ministry of Health, 2026) (RCOG, 2015/2023)

Temporary risk period: The Ministry table evaluates temporary risks until the risk disappears. In RCOG September 2026, other surgery, OHSS, qualified systemic infection and immobilization/dehydration lines are 4 points; LMWH is planned for another 7 days as long as the risk persists and after it improves. Correction of risk does not eliminate the continuation window. In defined severe hyperemesis, LMWH is indicated to be offered within 72 hours; For those hospitalized with HG or other temporary immobility-related condition, continue until risk resolves and then for another week. (RCOG, September 2026)

Mode of delivery: Cesarean delivery in labor scores 2 points; elective cesarean delivery scores 1 point. Urgent/unplanned cesarean delivery before labor begins is not explicitly scored within the Ministry table's binary split; scores must not be improvised. RCOG Section 7.4 recommends considering 10 days of LMWH after non-elective cesarean delivery, and 10 days after elective cesarean delivery if an additional risk factor is present. (Ministry of Health, 2026) (RCOG, 2015/2023)

Highest risk groups

The highest risk pregnant women requiring prophylaxis are (UpToDate): a single unprovoked episode of VTE; a single estrogen-related VTE (pregnancy, oral contraceptive, ovarian hyperstimulation); recurrent VTE (regardless of provoked/unprovoked distinction); and a single episode of VTE accompanied by a persistent risk factor (immobilization, active cancer). The risk of recurrence in pregnant women with a previous history of VTE is between 2.5–11%; At the upper end of this range are unprovoked, recurrent, and hormone/pregnancy-related VTEs. In women who are provoked only by a major temporary cause (surgery, trauma) and do not have additional risk factors, prophylaxis is usually reserved only for the postpartum period.

Risk stratification in hereditary thrombophilias

Not every pregnant woman with hereditary thrombophilia requires prophylaxis; The decision is made based on the type of thrombophilia and personal/family history of VTE, often in collaboration with hematology. The absolute VTE risks of high-risk and low-risk thrombophilias during pregnancy + puerperium are summarized below (UpToDate, "Inherited thrombophilias in pregnancy").

Table 2. UpToDate absolute-risk framework: thrombophilias without personal history of VTE
Thrombophilia Risk class Pregnancy + puerperium VTE risk
Antithrombin deficiency High ~6.1% (<35 years) – 9.0% (≥35 years)
Factor V Leiden + prothrombin G20210A (combined heterozygous) High ~5.5% – 8.2%
Factor V Leiden homozygous High ~2.2% – 3.4%
Factor V Leiden heterozygous Low ~0.5% – 0.7%
Prothrombin G20210A heterozygous Low ~0.4% – 0.6%
Protein C or protein S deficiency Low ~0.7% – 1.1%

Risk class depends on source context: The protein C/S designation in the absolute-risk table above is not the same label as the Department/RCOG score group. The Ministry considers Table 1 and RCOG protein C/S deficiency as high-risk thrombophilia, 3 points. The RCOG recommends specialist evaluation and 6 weeks of postnatal prophylaxis in this asymptomatic high-risk group, even if there is no additional risk. The Ministry's Table 3 gives 7 days for asymptomatic thrombophilias other than antithrombin/combined/homozygous or 6 weeks for family/additional risk; There is a time/approach mismatch between the general Table 2 and these specific rows. The tool does not automatically reduce this difference to 7 or 10 days; An expert plan is required. MTHFR and PAI-1 variants do not bring VTE prophylaxis points in the Ministry; RCOG also states to ignore MTHFR. (Ministry of Health, 2026) (RCOG, 2015/2023)

Previous VTE exception: Single major surgery-related event distinguished from other types of VTE. While the Ministry's Table 2 gives the 28th week approach with a total of 3 points, Table 3 advises considering antenatal prophylaxis, rather than routinely recommending it, for a single VTE due to a transient cause without additional risk factors. In RCOG, there is expert evaluation for this group instead of routine prophylaxis in early pregnancy, and in Annex IV there is an approach starting from the 28th week. Confirmed previous VTE requires at least 6 weeks postpartum, regardless of mode of delivery. Antithrombin deficiency, APS+VTE and long-term anticoagulation are expert groups independent of the simple score. (Ministry of Health, 2026) (RCOG, 2015/2023)

Antiphospholipid syndrome (acquired thrombophilia) significantly increases the risk of both venous and arterial thrombosis; The risk is proportional to the number of positive antibodies (at the highest triple positivity) and titer size, and its management is discussed under a separate heading.

Pharmacological prophylaxis: Agent selection and dosing

The main agent of thromboprophylaxis in pregnancy is low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). Heparins do not cross the placenta and do not cause fetal anticoagulation; LMWH provides a more predictable anticoagulant response compared to unfractionated heparin (UFH), does not require routine monitoring, and has a lower risk of heparin-associated thrombocytopenia (HIT) (UpToDate, "Anticoagulation during pregnancy and postpartum: Agent selection and dosing"). A systematic review covering 64 studies and 2,777 pregnancies found LMWH to be safe and effective (venous thrombosis 0.8%, significant bleeding 2%, no cases of HIT reported).

UpToDate defines three levels for dosing: low dose (prophylaxis), intermediate dose (prophylaxis adjusted for gestational weight gain), and therapeutic dose (VTE treatment). Ministry 2026 and RCOG's tables with different dates use different bands according to weight. The following lines are separated by the resource name; high risk, renal function, bleeding, and delivery/anesthesia schedule may alter dosing decisions.

Table 3. LMWH (enoxaparin) and UFH doses (subcutaneous) during pregnancy
Level Dose Source / note
Low dose prophylaxis (fixed) Enoxaparin 40 mg/day (body weight <100 kg); 60 mg/day (≥100 kg). Dalteparin 5,000 units/day. UpToDate; Highlow trial
Low dose prophylaxis (banded by weight) <50 kg: 20 mg/day · 50–90 kg: 40 mg/day · 91–130 kg: 60 mg/day · 131–170 kg: 80 mg/day · >170 kg: 0.6 mg/kg/day Ministry of Health 2026 Table 4; RCOG 2015 historical Table 3. Higher bands with asterisks can be given in two divided doses. (Ministry of Health, 2026) (RCOG, 2015/2023)
RCOG September 2026 — updated prophylaxis bands <100 kg: 40 mg/day · 100–129 kg: 60 mg/day · 130–169 kg: 80 mg/day · ≥170 kg: 0.6 mg/kg/day . The last three weight bands can be given in two divided doses. RCOG Position Statement Table 1; replaces the previous RCOG dosing table and refers to the NHS MCB recommendations for the period before initial antenatal booking. (RCOG, September 2026)
Medium dose Enoxaparin should be increased according to weight gain at a maximum dose of 1 mg/kg once a day. UpToDate
Therapeutic dose Enoxaparin 1 mg/kg every 12 hours (2×/day) or dalteparin 100 units/kg every 12 hours UpToDate (2× daily is preferred over single dose)
UFH prophylaxis (by trimester) 5,000–7,500 U (T1) → 7,500–10,000 U (T2) → 10,000 U (T3), every 12 hours UpToDate

Low dose or medium dose?

The open-label randomized Highlow study (Lancet 2022; PMID 36354038), which included 1,110 women with a previous history of VTE and an indication for antepartum prophylaxis, compared a weight-adjusted intermediate dose with a fixed low dose. The risk of VTE was similar in the two groups (intermediate-dose 2% versus low-dose 3%; relative risk 0.69; 95% CI 0.32–1.47), and rates of clinically significant bleeding were also similar (4% in both groups). ASH 2018 Recommendation 28 recommends, with a conditional, very low certainty of evidence, that the intermediate dose should not be used instead of the antepartum standard dose in pregnant women requiring prophylaxis; this recommendation predates the 2022 Highlow study ( ASH, 2018 ). Individual evaluation remains important in weight extremes and very high-risk cases.

Timing and duration of prophylaxis

In the highest risk patients, prophylaxis is initiated when pregnancy is diagnosed and continued throughout pregnancy and for at least 6 weeks postpartum (as long as the risk of bleeding is considered low). In the highest risk group (e.g. unprovoked VTE + persistent risk factor) the period can be extended up to 3 months after birth. In other risk groups, timing and duration are individualized; The postpartum threshold is generally lower than antepartum because the risk of VTE is highest and the potential for obstetric bleeding is lowest (UpToDate). In cases requiring antepartum hospitalization (nondelivery) (critical illness, nonobstetric surgery, orthopedic injury, hospitalization for >3 days, hyperemesis, preeclampsia), prophylaxis is applied with the same criteria as for non-pregnant patients.

Mechanical prophylaxis and patients at high risk of bleeding

Mechanical methods are preferred instead of pharmacological prophylaxis in pregnant women with a high risk of bleeding (e.g. uncontrolled hypertension, placenta previa, abruption, expanding subchorionic hematoma, bleeding diathesis); The primary option is intermittent pneumatic compression devices, graduated compression stockings are the alternative (UpToDate, Grade 2C). Graduated compression stockings are not used alone for primary VTE prevention; Its main use is symptom relief in post-thrombotic syndrome and in the presence of contraindications to pharmacological prophylaxis. Pharmacological prophylaxis is initiated or restarted once the risk of bleeding has decreased to an acceptable level; some experts prefer UFH in this situation due to its short half-life and reversibility with protamine sulfate.

Birth, neuraxial anesthesia and peripartum management

Anticoagulation during labor should be discontinued except in the highest risk situations; Normal coagulation is necessary for both safe neuraxial anesthesia and the prevention of excessive bleeding at birth. Neuraxial techniques (spinal, epidural, combined) are not performed in anticoagulated patients due to the risk of spinal/epidural hematoma. Safe intervals between the last LMWH dose and neuraxial intervention (based on ASRA and SOAP guidelines) are summarized below.

Table 4. Minimum time required between last anticoagulant dose and neuraxial intervention
Regimen Waiting interval before a neuraxial procedure
Prophylactic dose LMWH ≥ 12 hours after last dose
Medium and therapeutic dose LMWH ≥ 24 hours after last dose
Prophylactic / therapeutic UFH After aPTT returns to normal (normalization may take up to 24 hours for subcutaneous therapeutic UFH)

Practical approaches (UpToDate): (1) LMWH is continued and induction/cesarean section is planned at 39 weeks — low dose final injection given 12 hours before the procedure, medium/therapeutic dose 24 hours before the procedure; (2) or by switching from LMWH to UFH at approximately the 36th week, peripartum control is facilitated. If spontaneous labor begins, LMWH is discontinued immediately. Anticoagulation is restarted postpartum, 4–6 hours after vaginal birth and 6–12 hours after cesarean section (if there is no significant bleeding or traumatic catheter). A subanalysis of the Highlow study showed that 82% of patients on low-dose LMWH (93% in planned labor) were amenable to neuraxial intervention at the onset of unplanned labor.

Diagnosis: Imaging in suspected DVT and PE

Since D-dimer increases physiologically during pregnancy, its diagnostic value alone is limited; Diagnosis is based on imaging.

  • Suspicion of DVT: The first step is radiation-free compression (duplex) ultrasonography; proximal leg veins are evaluated. If clinical suspicion is high and the initial examination is negative, the examination is repeated or further imaging is performed for isolated iliac vein thrombosis. In those with a previous history of DVT, baseline compression USG is recommended to facilitate interpretation of subsequent examinations.
  • Suspicion of PE: First, a chest x-ray is taken. If the graph is normal, ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) scintigraphy is preferred; If the radiograph is abnormal or there is known lung disease, CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is recommended. The fetal radiation dose of both methods is low; Given the high mortality of undiagnosed and untreated PE (up to 30%), imaging should not be avoided.

Anticoagulants contraindicated in pregnancy

Some anticoagulants are avoided in pregnancy for fetal safety reasons:

  • Warfarin and other vitamin K antagonists: they freely cross the placenta and are teratogenic; the highest risk occurs with exposure at 6–12 weeks of pregnancy (warfarin embryopathy), and they can cause fetal bleeding at any stage. The only exceptions are selected cases with a very high risk of thrombosis, such as a mechanical heart valve.
  • Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC — dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban): Not for use in pregnancy due to insufficient safety and efficacy data and reproductive risks in animal studies; It is also not recommended during breastfeeding. Women who become pregnant while taking DOAC should be switched to LMWH.

Fondaparinux in breastfeeding: there is a difference between institutions. ASH 2018 Recommendation 12 lists certain agents, including UFH, LMWH, warfarin, and fondaparinux, as safe options in breastfeeding women requiring anticoagulation; The recommendation is strong, the evidence of effect is less certain. On the other hand, Ministry of Health 2026, printed p.13 states that fondaparinux should not be used in lactating mothers. These two suggestions are not the same; Agent selection is made by the relevant expert and national/institutional protocol. Avoidance of DOACs in breastfeeding is included in both sources. (Ministry of Health, 2026) (ASH, 2018)

Controversial points and current changes

  • Scoring discussion: While RCOG mandates formal numerical scoring, ACOG adopts a categorical narrative approach, and UpToDate does not routinely use scoring tools because they are unvalidated. These three approaches may lead to different prophylaxis rates (7–40%); Institutional protocol and multidisciplinary evaluation are important in the clinic.
  • Dosage discussion: Before the Highlow study, the pharmacokinetic superiority of the medium dose was considered; Post-study evidence supports lower dosing for most patients, but individualization remains at weight extremes and in very high-risk cases due to the study's wide confidence interval and low event rate.
  • Data limitation: Most recommendations for thromboprophylaxis in pregnancy are based on indirect evidence from the non-pregnant population and expert opinion due to the paucity of randomized data; This is the main reason for differences between guides.

Clinical summary

  • Pregnancy and puerperium increase the risk of VTE by 4–5 times; The daily risk is highest during the puerperium, especially in the first 3–6 weeks. All pregnant women should be evaluated for risk in the early period.
  • Ministry 2026 and RCOG September 2026 are separate score models. Postpartum ≥4 points at least 6 weeks in the ministry; In RCOG, BMI ≥50 is a special rule throughout pregnancy and 6 weeks postpartum. Previous VTE, thrombophilia, transient risk and bleeding conditions may precede the overall score. ( Ministry of Health, 2026 ) ( RCOG, September 2026 ) ( RCOG, 2015/2023 )
  • The principal agent is LMWH. In low-dose prophylaxis, enoxaparin 40 mg/day (<100 kg) is standard; therapeutic dose 1 mg/kg every 12 hours. Warfarin and DOAC are contraindicated during pregnancy.
  • Neuraxial intervention is performed ≥12 hours after the last dose for prophylactic LMWH, ≥24 hours after the intermediate/therapeutic dose; Anticoagulation is restarted after 4–6 hours for vaginal delivery and 6–12 hours for cesarean section.
  • The first step in the diagnosis of DVT is compression USG; In PE, V/Q is preferred if the radiograph is normal, and CTPA is preferred if it is abnormal.

🔄 Current Developments (2026)

September 2026 RCOG interim update changed prophylaxis doses based on BMI ≥50, interim risk score/durations, and weight. The Ministry of Health's 2026 national guide was published with a separate score and duration table. Therefore, the statement “threshold scores and doses unchanged” does not represent these versions. (Ministry of Health, 2026) (RCOG, September 2026)

Correct use of RCOG version

While the full new edition of RCOG 37a is being prepared, the 2015 guideline (PDF with 2023 corrections) is used together with the September 2026 Position Statement. The position statement includes the new score and dose table; The 2015 table alone should not be presented under a current RCOG label. There is also guidance on NHS England Maternal Care Bundle recommendations for the management of those experiencing first trimester miscarriage/termination; These issues do not equate to a simple ongoing pregnancy/puerperium score. ( RCOG, September 2026 ) ( RCOG, 2015/2023 )

The evidence base for risk scoring was found to be quantitatively weak (2024)

NIHR Health Technology Assessment synthesis (Davis et al., Health Technol Assess 2024;28(9); PMID 38476084) systematically compiled and decision-analytic modeling of 17 studies and 19 externally validated models in pregnancy/puerperium. The sensitivity of the models varies between 0-100% and the specificity varies between 5-100%; most have high/unclear bias. The most critical finding: the real source of decision uncertainty is not which model is chosen, but the lack of direct evidence for the effectiveness of thromboprophylaxis in preventing VTE in pregnancy/puerperium; The recommendations are based largely on indirect evidence. The analysis revealed that the most valuable study in the future will be an RCT of thromboprophylaxis versus placebo in obese puerperants.

The first concrete step to address this gap was the PP-HEP pilot RCT (Blondon et al., BJOG 2024;132(1):35-43; PMID 39238110): compared enoxaparin 40-60 mg/day × 10 days in 77 moderate-risk puerperants; A large multinational RCT was shown to be feasible, with the participation rate being significantly higher than in the North American trials (no VTE events at 3 months; bleeding signal in the prophylaxis arm). It is a proof of feasibility, not effectiveness.

Validated clinical decision rule for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism

The information that D-dimer increases physiologically during pregnancy and is not diagnostic by itself is valid; however, the current synthesis (CHEST 2025) highlights that two prospective studies (CT-PE/Righini 2018 and ARTEMIS 2019) have prospectively shown for the first time that the negative D-dimer + clinical prediction rule safely excludes PE without chest imaging.

Pregnancy-adjusted YEARS (ARTEMIS): Three criteria—clinical evidence of DVT, hemoptysis, PE being the most likely diagnosis—are questioned. PE is excluded if the threshold D-dimer is <1000 ng/mL if there is none, and <500 ng/mL if there are ≥1 criteria; In case of DVT, compression ultrasound is performed first. In ARTEMIS, this algorithm made CT pulmonary angiography unnecessary in ~39% of cases (van der Pol et al., N Engl J Med 2019;380:1139-1149). Attention: ~39% belongs to ARTEMIS; The trimester-related rates of 65% (1st trimester) / 32% (3rd trimester) belong to a separate study (CT-PE/Righini) and should not be confused.

Antithrombin deficiency: real-world data growing, regimen still unclear

Multicenter retrospective series accumulated in 2024-2025 in antithrombin deficiency, the highest-risk thrombophilia; LMWH with anti-Xa monitoring and peripartum antithrombin concentrate management in selected cases are being evaluated, but the optimal regimen is still at the expert consensus/case series level, with no new RCTs (JTH 2025; Thromb Res 2024). The practical approach remains co-management with hematology.

Finally, inter-guideline inconsistency was formally documented in 2025: a comparison of international guidelines for postpartum VTE prophylaxis showed that different guidelines lead to different prophylaxis decisions in the same patient (PMID 39939968, 2025) — confirming the structural reason behind variable prophylaxis rates.

← All scientific guides

📚 Resources

  • Ministry of Health. Risky Pregnancies Management Guide. Ankara, 2026; Publication No 1414. VTE section, Tables 1–4, printed pp.1–16. Official full text.
  • RCOG. Green-top Guideline No.37a Position Statement . September 2026; 4 pages. Updated Annex I and Table 1. Official update .
  • RCOG Green-top Guideline No.37a (2015; 2023 corrected PDF) — “Reducing the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism during Pregnancy and the Puerperium”; numerical risk scoring and prophylactic LMWH doses by weight: rcog.org.uk
  • ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 196 (2018) — “Thromboembolism in Pregnancy” (Obstet Gynecol 2018;132:e1-17; superseded PB 123); categorical risk approach: acog.org
  • ASH 2018 Guideline (Bates SM et al.) — “Management of VTE: VTE in the context of pregnancy” (Blood Adv 2018;2(22):3317-3359; PMID 30482767); GRADE-based prophylaxis/dosing recommendations: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  • Highlow study (Bistervels IM et al., Lancet 2022;400:1777-1787; PMID 36354038) — comparison of low-dose and medium-dose LMWH in pregnancy (history of previous VTE): pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  • UpToDate — “Venous thromboembolism in pregnancy and postpartum: Prevention” (Wolters Kluwer; Topic 1347, version 51.0; updated 11 August 2026, literature September 2026; full text access 1 November 2026); patient selection, prophylaxis duration, mechanical methods: uptodate.com
  • UpToDate — “Anticoagulation during pregnancy and postpartum: Agent selection and dosing” (Wolters Kluwer, current; last updated January 2026, accessed May 2026); LMWH/UFH dosing, neuraxial timing: uptodate.com
  • UpToDate — “Inherited thrombophilias in pregnancy” (Wolters Kluwer, updated; accessed May 2026); high/low risk thrombophilia classification and absolute VTE risks: uptodate.com
  • NICE Guideline NG89 — “Venous thromboembolism in over 16s: reducing the risk of hospital-acquired DVT or PE” (pregnancy/puerperium risk assessment tool, based on RCOG 37a): nice.org.uk
  • ATS/STR Clinical Practice Guideline — “Evaluation of Suspected Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnancy” (Am J Respir Crit Care Med); V/Q and CTPA algorithm: atsjournals.org
  • ACCP/CHEST 2012 (Bates SM et al.) — “VTE, Thrombophilia, Antithrombotic Therapy, and Pregnancy” (Chest 2012;141(2 Suppl):e691S-e736S); prophylaxis duration and fondaparinux recommendation: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  • Sultan AA et al. (Blood 2013;121(19):3953-3961) — "Risk factors for first venous thromboembolism around pregnancy: a population-based cohort study (UK)"; absolute incidence and risk factors: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  • Davis S, Pandor A, Sampson FC, et al. (2024) — Systematic review and economic evaluation of VTE risk models in pregnancy/puerperium; It quantifies the weak evidence base for risk scoring and that the main gap is prophylaxis effectiveness. Health Technol Assess 2024;28(9):1-176; PMID 38476084: full text (NIHR, open access)
  • Blondon M, Claver M, Celetta E, et al. (2024) — PP-HEP pilot RCT: feasibility of postpartum thromboprophylaxis with enoxaparin in intermediate-risk puerperants; paves the way for large multinational RCTs. BJOG 2024;132(1):35-43; PMID 39238110: source
  • NICE NG89 — 2024 Exceptional Surveillance Review (2024) — Evidence reviewed, guidance will not be updated; RCOG risk tool recommendation in pregnancy/puerperium is in effect. source
  • RCOG 37a official release page — The 2015/2023 text is used with the September 2026 interim update just as the new guidance is being prepared. source
  • Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism During Pregnancy — CHEST (2025) — Current synthesis of pregnancy-adjusted YEARS/ARTEMIS and CT-PE prospective evidence; summarizes that thresholded D-dimer + clinical rule reduces BTPA. source
  • van der Pol LM, Tromeur C, Bistervels IM, et al. — ARTEMIS (2019) — Pregnancy-adapted YEARS algorithm; With threshold D-dimer + clinical rule, CTPA becomes unnecessary in ~39% of cases (landmark prospective study). N Engl J Med 2019;380:1139-1149: source
  • ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 196 (2018; reaffirmed 2025) — Thromboembolism in pregnancy; It remained in force by being re-approved in 2025. Obstet Gynecol 2018;132(1):e1-e17: source
  • Postpartum VTE prophylaxis guideline comparison (2025) — Documents that international guidelines lead to different prophylaxis decisions in the same patient. PMID 39939968: source

Last updated: . This clinical update covers the differences in risk scores, duration, and prophylaxis dosing between the Ministry of Health 2026 and RCOG September 2026 guidelines.